By Dr Scott J Turner, Specialist Plastic Surgeon (FRACS) | Bondi Junction, Sydney
By Dr Scott J Turner, Specialist Plastic Surgeon (FRACS) | Bondi Junction, Sydney
“Preservation deep plane facelift” is a term I get asked about a lot in my Bondi Junction consulting rooms. Patients come in having read about it online, watched videos from American surgeons, and scrolled through before-and-afters on Instagram. And the question is usually some version of: is this something new I should know about, or is it just marketing?
It’s a fair question. Honestly, the answer sits somewhere in between.
I perform deep plane facelift surgery regularly at my practice in Sydney’s Eastern Suburbs. I also perform SMAS facelifts and other facial surgery techniques. So I want to explain what “preservation” actually refers to in surgical terms, where it genuinely differs from a standard deep plane approach, and where I think the terminology gets overblown.
Explore topics on this page
So What Does “Preservation” Actually Mean Here?
The word gets used loosely, which is part of the confusion.
In a surgical context, preservation refers to keeping certain anatomical relationships intact during dissection. Maintaining blood supply to the skin. Not undermining tissue planes further than you need to. Being selective about which ligaments you release and how. These aren’t radical ideas. Good surgeons have been doing this for years without giving it a separate name.
But there are some genuine technical modifications that fall under the preservation umbrella, and they’re worth understanding if you’re comparing facelift options.
Quick Recap: How a Standard Deep Plane Facelift Works
Before getting into the differences, it helps to understand what we’re comparing against.
A deep plane facelift enters beneath the SMAS layer. That’s the superficial musculoaponeurotic system, a sheet of muscle and connective tissue sitting under the skin and fat. Once you’re beneath this layer, you can release the retaining ligaments that hold everything anchored to bone. That’s what allows you to reposition the midface, clean up the jawline, and address the neck as a connected unit.
The difference between this and an SMAS facelift (which works on the SMAS through folding or tightening but doesn’t go beneath it) is significant. Deep plane surgery repositions the actual foundation. SMAS plication tightens it from the surface. Both have their place, but they do different things.
With a deep plane approach, the skin gets redraped over the repositioned structures without being pulled tight. That’s why deep plane results tend to avoid the stretched look that older facelift techniques were known for.
The Preservation Modification: What’s Actually Different
The preservation approach isn’t a completely separate operation. It’s a set of refinements to how deep plane surgery is performed, and the differences are more about surgical philosophy than they are about a brand-new procedure.
The core idea is this: keep the skin, fat, and SMAS connected as a composite unit wherever possible, rather than separating them into individual layers. In a conventional deep plane facelift, the surgeon typically elevates skin away from the SMAS across a broad area before entering the deeper plane. The preservation version limits that step. You enter the deep plane through the SMAS without peeling the skin off first, so the whole thing moves as one piece.
There’s a practical logic to this. When skin stays connected to its underlying blood supply and lymphatic channels, it tends to recover with less bruising and swelling. Patients I’ve operated on with limited undermining do seem to look less beaten up in those early weeks. But I want to be careful not to oversell that point. We’re still talking about surgery that involves sub-SMAS dissection and ligament release. Nobody’s back at the office on day five.
The other piece that matters from a technical standpoint is where and how the SMAS flap is created. Every surgeon who works in the deep plane makes decisions about tissue thickness, flap geometry, and how to anchor the repositioned structures. The preservation approach pays particular attention to these decisions, aiming to work through the thicker, stronger portions of the SMAS rather than the thinner areas closer to the centre of the face. It’s a subtle distinction, but it affects flap reliability and how well the repositioned tissues hold their position over time.
What patients tend to notice most, though, is the contour. When you keep skin and fat attached to the deeper layers, the natural volume of the face moves with the lift rather than getting disrupted. The cheek fullness stays where it belongs. You don’t get that slightly hollowed or flat look in the lateral cheek that can happen when layers are widely separated and then redraped independently. For someone who tells me they want to “look like myself, just less tired,” that kind of detail matters.
The caveat to all of this is that not everyone’s anatomy suits a preservation approach. Patients with a lot of excess skin, significant sun damage, or heavy neck banding may actually need that broader dissection to get a proper result. Cookie-cutter approaches don’t work in facial surgery.
Why the Label Matters Less Than You Think
Here’s what I really want patients in Sydney to take away from this.
A preservation deep plane and a standard deep plane are both deep plane operations. They’re closer to each other than either one is to an SMAS plication or a skin-only lift. The distinctions between them are real, but they’re refinements within the same category of surgery, not a leap into something fundamentally different.
Facelift terminology has become genuinely confusing. You’ll hear about short scar facelifts, ponytail facelifts, the Vertical Restore Facelift, high SMAS, composite lifts, extended deep plane. Lots of labels. Some describe meaningful differences. Others are mainly branding.
The real dividing lines in facelift surgery are about depth (are you working on the skin, the SMAS surface, or beneath the SMAS?) and extent (how much of the face and neck are you addressing?). Everything else, the vector, the entry geometry, the degree of undermining, those are refinements within those categories. Important refinements, yes. But not the thing you should be losing sleep over when choosing between surgeons.
What to Actually Ask Your Surgeon
This is something I don’t see discussed enough. Patients spend hours researching technique names online but don’t always know what to ask in the consulting room. Here’s what I’d suggest focusing on instead of whether someone calls their approach “preservation” or not.
How many deep plane facelifts do you perform each year? Volume matters. This isn’t a procedure you want done by someone who does it occasionally between other types of surgery. A surgeon whose practice centres on facial work will have a different level of pattern recognition and problem-solving than someone who does a few facelifts a year alongside body contouring or breast surgery.
What will you do differently for my face? The answer should be specific. If a surgeon gives you the same recommendation they give everyone, that’s a concern. Your bone structure, skin thickness, degree of descent, neck anatomy, and fat distribution are unique to you. The surgical plan should reflect that.
Can I see results in patients with similar anatomy to mine? Not just the strongest outcomes in the portfolio. Ask to see patients who had comparable starting points. This gives you a much more realistic sense of what your outcome might look like.
What happens if my result isn’t what we discussed? Any honest surgeon will tell you that outcomes vary. What you want to hear is how they handle revision cases and what their policy is for touch-ups or adjustments.
The technique a surgeon uses is far less important than how well they assess your anatomy, how they adapt their approach to your specific situation, and how many times they’ve done it. I’d take a surgeon with fifteen years of deep plane experience using their preferred modification over someone who recently adopted the “preservation” label because it’s trending on social media.
Who Might Suit This Approach?
Patients I’d typically consider for preservation-style deep plane techniques have moderate midface descent, early jowl formation, some loss of definition along the jaw, and decent skin elasticity. They want structural change but they also care about a shorter initial recovery window.
Someone with very significant skin laxity, heavy neck banding, or substantial volume loss might benefit more from a conventional deep plane approach, possibly combined with a neck lift or deep neck lift and facial fat grafting.
That’s why I don’t commit to a technique before I’ve assessed someone properly. During a consultation at our Bondi Junction rooms, I look at bone structure, ligament integrity, skin thickness, the neck, everything. The technique follows the anatomy. Not the other way around.
Candidates also need to be non-smokers (tobacco and nicotine stopped at least six weeks either side of surgery), at a stable weight, and in good general health. Men have additional considerations including beard-bearing skin, which affects incision planning. More on that on our male facelift and male neck lift pages.
Frequently Asked Questions
Next Steps
If you’d like to talk through whether a deep plane facelift (preservation or standard) could address your concerns, book a consultation with Dr Scott J Turner at FacePlus Aesthetics in Bondi Junction, Sydney’s Eastern Suburbs. I see patients from across Sydney and interstate.
